Differences Between Hindu And Mormon Marriages Religion Essay

Differences Between Hindu And Mormon Marriages Religion Essay Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, also known as LDS or Mormons, have different customs and beliefs regarding marriage, compared to members of the Hinduism faith. Three significant differences of marriage within the Hindu and Mormon faiths include: how the bride and groom meet before marriage, the wedding ceremony, and the eternal perspective of their marriage. Let me review these three significant differences in more detail. Although 90% of Hindus and 83% of Mormons marry within their own faith in the US, there is a significant difference in how they are paired up in general (Haniffa, p. 1). Finding a spouse to marry is the first difference between the Hindu and Mormon faith. In an LDS relationship, the couple usually goes through a courting process. The individual is free to choose their own partner according to their own interests. LDS singles will date and court many different members before settling down with the person whom they will often refer to as their eternal companion. When they agree to be married, they are then considered engaged. In contrast, Hindus believe that there are eight different types of marriage arrangements. These are found under the laws of Manu. The Laws of Manu describe an ideal code of behavior for Hindus. (Matthews 77) The eight types of marriage are: the rite of Brahmana (Brahma), that of the gods (Daiva), that of the Rishis (Arsha), that of Prajapati (Prajapatya), that of the Asuras (Asura), that of the Gandharvas (Gandharva), that of the Rakshasas (Rakshasa), and that of the Pisakas (Paisaka). (Manusmrti (Laws of Manu) Matthews, p. 21) Of these eight types of marriage, not all of them have religious procedures and the last four are condemned, such as the Pisakas (Paisaka). The Pisakas is defined below. When a man by stealth seduces a girl who is sleeping, intoxicated, or disordered in intellect, that is the eighth, the most base and sinful rite of the Pisakas. (From Manusmrti (Laws of Manu) Chapter III #31) Although arranged marriage is on the decline, it is still, by far, the most common form of marriage in the Hindu Religion. One website reported that in India 95% of marriages were arranged (Gibson, p. 1). Arranged marriage generally takes place when the parents of the bride and groom find a match for their son or daughter. Some considerations such as education, wealth, horoscope, and caste help the parents better choose a spouse for their son or daughter. Once the elders and family agree upon likely compatibility of the couple, they are engaged to be married, sometimes without having ever even met. Second, there are differences between the marriage ceremony of a Mormon and the marriage of a Hindu. Although a Mormon can be married legally in a court of law, the most honorable, preferred, and sought after way of marriage is being sealed or married in a LDS Temple. The Holy Temple is a sacred building where sacred and confidential ordinances are performed. Those who enter the temple agree to keep these procedures and ordinances sacred and confidential. When the couple enters the temple, they change into all white clothes and are prepared for the sealing ordinance of marriage. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints does not give permission to disclose these ordinances. The Church counsels: We do not quote the words of the sealing ordinance outside of the temple, but we may describe the sealing room as being beautiful in its appointment, quiet and serene in spirit, and hallowed by the sacred work that is performed there. (Preparing to Enter the Holy Temple) Not everyone is permitted to enter an LDS temple. Only those who have been found worthy can enter. In some cases, one or both parents may not be allowed to enter the temple as they have not been found worthy. It is recommended that only family and very close friends to the bride and groom are allowed to attend. Wedding groups should be small, comprising only the members of the two families and some few who are very close to the couple. A wedding reception is to provide a time for greeting the friends and the well-wishers. (Preparing to Enter the Holy Temple) Within the Hindu faith, however, the whole family is involved, and it is a celebration that can last for hours or days. A Hindu wedding is officiated under a mandap, by a Hindu Priest. Anyone who the family wants to attend is welcome. The ceremony phases, rituals, and words are not confidential. They have deep meaning and symbolism for all to witness. The main colors of the brides dress are primarily red and gold. The ceremony can vary from region to region depending where one lives. One of the ceremonial rituals for the marriage includes a fire. The Pratigna-Karan is a part of the ceremony where bride and groom circle a fire, bride leading, and make commitments of loyalty, love, and fidelity. Last, the difference between Hindu marriage and Mormon marriage is their eternal perspective to the marriage. Although the temple wedding ordinance is not disclosed by the LDS church, the principle and covenant behind the ordinance is. A covenant is an agreement between mankind and God. The temple covenant includes the couples promise to remain faithful to each other; in return the Lord promises that they will be sealed (married) together for life and all eternity. LDS members believe that through a temple sealing, they can enjoy each others companionship through this life and all eternity. When they pass away, their spirits are still bound by these sacred covenants and their spirits rest together in a spiritual paradise until the resurrection. When the resurrection occurs, their spirits are once again reunited with perfect physical bodies. It is only through marriage in the temple that one is able to dwell with the Lord in the highest degree of his kingdom. Although marriage is held sacred in the second phase of a Hindus life, it does not promise eternal life with their spouse and the Lord. When a Hindu couple joins in the union of marriage, they make commitments to each other, with God as their witness, but do not make a covenant with God. There are seven general vows that are made during a Hindu wedding. The last one is as follows: When the bride and the groom take the seventh and the last vow, they promise that they will be true and loyal to each other and will remain companions and best of friends for their lifetime. (Seven Vows of Marriage) When they die, they are no longer bound to one another and the cycle of Karma and re-incarnation begin again. This cycle of birth, life, death, and re-birth do not agree with the Mormon beliefs of birth, death, judgment and exaltation. In conclusion, Mormons have different customs and beliefs regarding marriage compared to members of the Hinduism faith. While they both believe that marriage is a sacred part of this life, many more differences exist. Many Hindus believe in arranged marriages, while Mormons believe in personally dating and courting several possible spouses before getting engaged. The actual wedding ceremonies of Hindu and Mormon religions have drastic contrast. Hindus are married under outdoor mantraps, openly, and with friends and family present. Their wedding can last for days. In contrast, Mormons are married in temples with only a few worthy family and friends present. Their wedding ceremony only lasts about 20 minutes. Possibly the biggest contrast of Mormon and Hindu marriages is their eternal perspective. Hindus believe that their marriage will dissolve after one partner dies, and then be reincarnated to a different body and life. Mormons, however, believe that their spouse will be their etern al companion. They believe that the only way to enter into the highest degree of heaven is through a temple marriage with a worthy partner. What would you prefer, spending eternity with one partner or returning time and again, each a new experience?

Analysis of the Book of the Dun Cow

In Walter Wangerin Jr. ‘s beast fable, The Book of the Dun Cow, two roosters have the unusual distinction of being Lords of their own manor. Webster defines a Lord as a â€Å"person having great powers and authority, a ruler or master,† where as a manor is defined as â€Å"the district over which a lord holds authority and domain† (Webster). Chauntecleer is introduced to the reader as the leader or Lord of the Coop and the ruler over the animals in the surrounding land. On the other hand, Cockatrice takes over as leader of his Coop and land after he kills his father, Senex. Chauntecleer and Cockatrice are two very different roosters who lead and rule their domain in stark contrast yet they are both labeled as Lords of the manor. Early on in the novel, Chauntecleer is portrayed as a short tempered, vain, and arrogant ruler who is not at all likeable. While he is proud and undoubtedly stubborn, he is also characterized as fair, compassionate, and just. With his noble bearing, Chauntecleer keeps a sense of order in his land and the animals' lives by crowing the canonical hours and occasional crows in his strong magnificent voice. His crows are compared to the clock of the community. Seven times a day, dutifully, with a deep sense of their importance, and by the immemorial command of the Divine, Chauntecleer crowed his canonical crows† (page 12). Crowing is his job and when he leads by his crows, the hens in his coop and the animals in his land are happy and unafraid, he is even able to make wrong things right. While Chauntecleer may be flawed as a le ader, his harem of hens and other creatures like John, Wesley Weasel, and Mundo Cani Dog see him as their protector and ruler. He protects the lives of those around him and sees that justice is carried out. As Lord he supports and protects his land and unites all his creatures whether fowl, rodent, or insect; animals large or small, wild or domestic to come join together to fight evil. East and upriver from Chauntecleer's land is another land ruled by another Lord, Cockatrice. A half rooster half serpent conceived as a result of an unnatural union of his rooster father, Senex, and the evil serpent Wyrm. Cockatrice rules his manor with threats and fear. Unlike his father, Senex, who always remembered the canonical crows to help unite his animals, Cockatrice never crows the canon. â€Å"So under him the day lost its meaning and its direction, and the animals lost any sense of time or purpose†¦ They were tired all the day long, and at night they did not sleep† (page 82). Under his evil rule, the creatures suffer from disunity, distrust, and dishonor. Cockatrice shows no concern for the animals of his land and resorts to having the Toad speak for him. He humiliates the animals a nd is an enemy to the creatures rather than a Lord. He rapes the hens and forces them to bear his children and suffer a cruel indignity. He swallows up thousands of children that hatch as Basilisk creatures and then vomits them back into the river. Rather than protect the creatures of his land, he orders his Basilisk children to kill everyone living until only he sits silently in his tree. Cockatrice leaves his land and flies west for he has no creatures to lord. By comparison, both Chauntecleer and Cockatrice are dominant roosters that command attention from the creatures in their communities. Likewise they are both offspring of past Lords of the Coop in their realm. Animals and creatures in their land and Coop hold a degree of fear of them. While both are able to gather their subjects together, the outcomes from these gatherings are fatally different. In contrast, the two Lords are as different as good and evil. While Chauntecleer is a strong postured, slightly scruffy, handsome rooster with noble bearing; Cockatrice is frightening and menacing with his serpent looking tail and bloody eyes. In return for his leadership and constant abiding, Chauntecleer asks only for good food, loyalty, sleep, a little color in his life, and a morning sunbath. On the other hand, Cockatrice demands total subservience from his creatures even though he shows them no respect or care. Chauntecleer rejoices and shares the pride of his three sons with his wife, Pertelote, with the creatures of the community while Cockatrice demands he have thousands of children by raping the hens to build an army of Basilisks who just by their touch cause death. As Lord of his land, Chauntecleer calls for all the creatures in his land to gather for a council so that he can prepare them for the upcoming battles with evil. In contrast, Cockatrice forbids the animals from gathering for meetings and even mere talking. Chauntecleer argues against revenge and hatred while Cockatrice is driven by this very evil. In Wangerin's novel, both Chauntecleer and Cockatrice have the gift of speech; however they each individually choose their own path of good or evil, order or chaos, and eventually life or death. Not only do all of the animal creatures from Cockatrice's land perish, he too dies because of his self destructive hatred. In the land of Chauntecleer, the creatures mourn the loss of their fellow animals killed in battle; however they look to their Lord of the manor to rebuild their land so they can serve their overall purpose to be the last protection against the almighty evil, Wyrm.

Group Assignment 1

Managerial Statistics (ENMGT 572) Group Assignment You are permitted to use SPSS to solve the following problems unless otherwise stated. Problem 1: Refer to the data file Executive salary. xls. This files shows annual salary of CEOs for various companies and industries. The random variable of interest for this exercise is Sum97. This is the CEO’s annual salary plus bonuses for the year 1997 (referred to as salary here-in).The purpose of this exercise is to determine if there is a significant difference between mean salaries of executives for various industries. There are 8 industries in this data file. Answer the following questions, assume = . 05 level for all tests. a. Briefly explain (in one or two sentences) what type of test approach you would use to determine if there is a difference in the mean salaries among all industries. Also, how would you set up the null and alternate hypothesis? b. Conduct a test to determine if the mean salaries among all industries are equival ent.Also, if there is a difference briefly explain or identify the variables or categories (treatment) that contribute to this difference (You may use Tukey’s Procedure for answering this part) c. Conduct a test to determine if there exist a difference in the mean executive salary for the following groups of industries: I. Industrial and Basic Materials II. Industrial and Technology III. Basic Materials and Technology Before conducting the test above, perform a test on equivalent population variances for each pair of company type.In a brief paragraph, comment of the conclusions of the test results. d. Determine the upper and lower range salary values for each industry at 90% and 95% confidence intervals e. Perform a test of normality (Chi-Square evaluation) on the data for each of the three industries in part c and comment on your findings. First produce a histogram with about 5 categories for this test and perform the test using a Chi-Squared approach. Problem 2: Refer to fi le â€Å"Heating_Bill. xls,† which provides heating bills on a sample of residential homes for the month of February.The file categorizes the data by the type of home (single level or two story) and heating source (natural gas, electric and oil). Conduct a test at the =. 05 level to answer the following questions: a. Is there evidence to suggest that the type of heating source used impacts the monthly heating bill? b. Is there evidence to suggest that the type of home (single or two story) impacts the monthly heating bill? c. Is there evidence to suggest that the interaction between these two categories (type of home or heating source) impacts the monthly heating bill?

The Fight Against The Minority Groups - 1740 Words

The Fight to Protect The recent political climate in this country has placed more focus on the rights of minorities. The current discourse is fierce, and it revolves around how much should be done when it comes to representing and fighting for minorities who are being discriminated against. The recent spike in hate crimes has done little to appease fears within these minority groups, and the persecution of minorities will create more problems for not just them, but for every citizen in this country. It is with that in mind that preeminent nonprofit organizations like the National Urban League have more of a responsibility now when it comes to ensuring the safety and success of the disenfranchised minority groups in the United States. Historically speaking, African Americans in this country have faced the most discrimination than any other minority group. As the history of the NUL has proven – they will not hide away from this responsibility of protecting them. The NUL is a non partisan civil rights organization based in New York City that advocates on behalf of African Americans and against racial discrimination in the United States. Being the oldest and largest community-based organization of its kind in the nation, they are the torch bearers for protecting the African American young men of this country, and they are needed now more than ever. The National Urban League was founded more than a century ago on September 29, 2010, primarily by Dr. George Edmund Haynes and RuthShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of The Book Double Victory 861 Words   |  4 Pagesto Ronald Takaki Name Institutional Affiliation â€Æ' Review When America entered into the Second World War it made their friends from different region and everywhere in the world to unite and fight for freedom and also fight against fascism. Ronald Takaki, a famous historian finds out that the armed fight for democracy abroad was followed by disregard of America that everyone was made or created equal. There was racism of all kinds; segregation of African Americans and imprisonment of Japanese AmericansRead MoreThe Importance of Protecting and Safeguarding the Interests of the Minority Groups1534 Words   |  6 Pages Introduction A minority group is a group belonging to a sociological category within a demographic are. All countries have minority groups living in the country. These minority groups are often subject to discrimination and at times racism (Mcllroy 1991). Many governments have put up laws to safeguard the interest of the minority groups. In the United States, there are numerous minority groups. One such minority groups in the blacks. Black Americans have been subject to racism and discriminationRead MoreDeaf Americans . Regularly, The Privileges Of Individuals1018 Words   |  5 Pagessituations where deaf Americans are wrongfully arrested after calling 911 for assistance. There are situations where deaf individuals die after the hospital withholds a basic medical diagnosis information. Certain institutions may even discriminate against deaf students in medical schools because they may feel like it’s too much of a hassle to provide an interpreter for that student. Deaf Americans are conti nuing to be held down because they still don’t have equal access like everybody else. BecauseRead MoreThomas Hobbes And John Locke1137 Words   |  5 Pagesthe United States, this theory has been utilized to grant equal rights to minority groups, such as African-American people, women, and LGBT people, even though a majority in government was often in opposition to these rights. If rights had been granted by a governmental social contract, and were not inherent, as Hobbes would argue, a majority faction in the government could have simply continued to oppress these minority groups. As a result, Locke’s theory of rights is more compelling, because whenRead MoreThomas Hobbes And John Locke1140 Words   |  5 Pageshistory of the United States, this theory has allowed minority groups, such as African-American people, women, and LGBT people, to achieve equal rights, even when a majority in elected government was in opposition to these rights. If the United States had instead utilized Hobbes’ theory, and rights were not inherent but granted by the governmen t, a majority faction in the government could have simply continued to oppress these minority groups. As a result, Locke’s theory of rights is more compellingRead MoreDiscrimination And Discrimination Against Minority Groups1034 Words   |  5 Pagesthe introduction of new policies in many countries. Indeed, in order to fight the issue of discrimination and redress the injustices, the positive discrimination concept has been introduced. This term, also named affirmative action, was first used by President Kennedy in 1961 in the United States. Its goal is â€Å"to overcome disadvantage over and above whatever is required to prevent actual discrimination against minority groups† (E.Burney 1988: 1). In other words, this measure tries to give more toRead MoreAnalysis Of Langston Hughes s Poem, I, Too1193 Words   |  5 Pagesmore; However, to obtain these perks, freedoms, and rights, the people must be able to fight and defend their rights. Therefore, along the many reas ons of being an American, to be an American means to fight for and defend their rights. Through the study of literature and history, the reader will learn that in certain circumstances, people will realize that they will have to fight and defend their rights against those who tries to take it away. In the poem, I, Too, Langston Hughes shows that toRead MoreThe War For Equality During The 20th Century1218 Words   |  5 Pagesand persecution at a high level, racial minorities were ready to fight back. In the first half of the Twentieth century the mistreatment of racial minorities led to a War for Equality; fought on many levels with varying levels of success. The war was fierce and did not end in the first half of the Twentieth Century. Like any war the War for Equality had its’ causes, in this case the war was brought about by the continued mistreatment of racial minorities. This mistreatment came in many forms: segregationRead MoreDoes One Gender Incite Fear Over Another?987 Words   |  4 Pagespolitical rally, in a group setting with hundreds of people around to encourage it. Prejudice can also be subtle and internally hidden; a decision not to frequent a small business because it’s run by a person of color. Intolerance and discrimination are still an issue today and have made little improvements from the past to present day. It can be seen socially in the way people stereotype minorities and it’s shows itself in the legal system with the denial of services to minority members. AdditionallyRead MoreThe Civil Rights Act Of 1964 Essay1444 Words   |  6 Pagesto minorities on paper and giving them opportunities to voice their political and community concerns. However, there were unforeseen c onsequences that added to the suffering of the community which they expressed through riots and protest marches in efforts to ensure their new protections were enforced. The advancement of the Act helped the African American civil rights group in their awareness and voice in government, made tremendous strides in their group, and contributed to other minorities to