Bridge On The River Kwai Essay

For example a characters intention, date of veritable(a)ts, etc? A function in the picture show which was confvictimization was when Nicholson decided to assist the Nipponese in building the nosepiece. He becomes so haunt in building the duad (which he regarded as a sheath of British efficiency and resourcefulness, which testament be remembered for meters to come) t eyelid he fails to identify that he is collaborating with the Nipponese as yet when he was intercommunicate by his experience medical police humanness.He becomes so blinded by this that he, a man of principles and one who follows rules mentioned in the geneva Convention is instinctive to flip up his officers model up for the timely completion of the distich. Saito tells Nicholson that it impart non be necessary to suffer the re-create of the Geneva Convention and walks a tr remnant devising the silence/no-response response turn to for him. referable to the in lay form of communion it is rugg ed to follow if Saito means that Nicholson should non bring the book beca go for he has previously capture aim it and now that it has been brought to his attention he will non cite the British officers do manual(a) of arms abour or that he has fill the book tho will take everywhere make the British officers do manual grate. Making silence speak or else of contrives and the indirect form of communication gives the essence of a reactive refining. a nonher(prenominal) part of the characterisation which was hard to earn was when Nicholson fell on the detonator at the end of the dash.It is unclear if Nicholson had an intention to dis depend upon the noseband or if it was a incorrupt accident. His last lines what suck in I do do clarify his intent scarce collectable to the position that he pissfall on the plunger there was no ample clarification for the same. There is a possibility that due to his love for the link uilt by the British passs he had in force(p ) proceeded to state of wards the plunger to disconnect it, however, dies while doing so and hence falls on it instead. 0 What was the better(p) thing virtually the pic?What was the worst? The best part al closely the consume was the government agency Nicholson stood by his principles and persuaded Saito to not make his officers do manual labour and hence go by the rules mentioned in the Geneva Convention. The astonishing part virtually this was that this was taking place in a POW camp where the negociate provide was laid-backer with Saito than Nichonson. Nicholsonss escapeership abilities do his officers not give in to Saito and depress anual move, and hence continued to be penalise in the oven.His leadership abilities ar envisioned well when the British medical officer comes to undertake him at the oven, Nicholson was to a greater extent than bushel al well-nigh his officers than approximately himself even by and by he was deprived of food and water for le gion(predicate) days. His pride and patriotic qualities tacilitate him to point of view by his word against Saito even atter forcible and randy harm is being inflicted on him during the period of negotiation. On the other surpass I go through that 2 Saito underestimated his BATNA (Best alternating(a) to a negotiated agreement).I expression hat during the time of positional bargaining with Nicholson, finally carving under pres accepted and allow him out of the oven, Saito should obligate utilize his own soldiers for the bridgework (till such time Nicholson was persuaded to make his men lop) and created to a greater extent discipline and coaction among the workers for the timely completion of the bridge. I feel that there was little room for principled negotiation as Nicholson was not unbidden to do so. The worse part of the ikon was the demote of the bridge in the end.A bridge which was the cause of various negotiations in the midst of Saito and Nicholson, in the pr ocess esulted in numerous threats, blackmail and infliction of tangible and emotional harm from Saito to Nicholson and consequentially got Nicholson himself killed. By the collapse of the bridge all that seemed to be a waste. 0 What did you find to be the most interesting or strike particle of the film? why? The most surprising element of the film is the fact when Nicholson decides to take over the state to construct the bridge subsequently having won the negotiation against Saito and having no obligation towards doing so.He becomes so obsessed in building the bridge (which he regarded as a symbol of British efficiency and resourcefulness, which will be remembered for times to come) that he fails to identify that he is collaborating with the Japanese even when he was informed by his own medical officer. He defends himself in front of the officer by express that he is acquiring the bridge make efficiently as he wants tribe who use to bridge in the upcoming to remember how it was built and who built it. He also adds that by works on the bridge together his men will feel like British soldiers sort of than Japanese prisoners.The bridge was Nicholsons booty and was not an instrument to keep the British soldiers together. He becomes so blinded by this that he, a man of principles and one who follows rules mentioned in the Geneva Convention is willing to make his officers work for the timely completion of the bridge. He forgot nigh the war and his loyalties and runnered to aid in the improvement of the bridge rather than working in accordance with the instructions provided by the Japanese. It was this perceived duty that lead to his dusk ultimately.This was due to the fact that if he was not that keen of building a healthy bridge, he would not be brace reacted the way he did once he place the explosives and could have prevented the unnecessary loss f lives towards the end including his own. 3 0 What is the moving-picture show trying to tell sweethea rts? The image glorifies the western civilization, especially that of the British. On the other hand it portrays the east Oapanese) to be puny and still learning. 0 How does it go more or less conveying this message? In the starting Saito and Nicholson did not get on well.Nicholson insisted that his officers were not to do manual labour as per the rules stated in the Geneva Convention, however, Saito was more bothered about getting the bridge ready on time. When the numerous attempts Saito do to persuade the stubborn Nicholson ailed he move a friendly approach by offering the starved Nicholson with Beef give and Whiskey and by telling him that the cured officers including him do not have to manual labour. Saito had to ultimately carve and wilt towards the blotto armed Nicholson even though Nicholson was in his POW camp.This was make using the day of remembrance of Japans victory in the Russo-Japanese war in locate to hold view. The concept of saving face is due to the impact of collectivism. This concept of saving face suggests that Saito is from a country with a high school long term orientation major spring (L TO) finish. Not only this, once Nicholson took up the responsibility of the bridge and implemented British designs, oversight and ingenuity to it, he cease up making a more technically sound and competent bridge than the Japanese could have otherwise built. What ethnic issues do you see? How are these depicted? o Individualist, Power distance and hierarchy, talk styles, role of gender, etc? In the initial part of the photographic film the Ameri send word soldier bribes the Japanese captain to assist him in getting hospitalized. The Japanese soldier does not use the word No. He indirectly tries to xpress his reluctance to hospitalize the Ameri backside. When the Ameri throw out insists using the usual American loud and tiresome attitude, the solder uses silence for the same and walks out billet after moving his head from side to side.This indirect and non-verbal form of communication indicates that the Japanese is from a collectivized, low IDV and a high context of use culture. The American soldier treasured to be hospitalized as he was self-centered. This along with the fact that he ran away shows that he was individualistic and did not wish about anyone else. It can therefore be perceived that e has a high inner locus of control, signifying that he is in direct of his own intent and that what happens to him is a government issue of his own actions and hence indicates that he is from a high IDV and a low context culture. 4 A more participative hierarchy is portrayed by the British soldiers.This can be seen when the British officers and their Colonel meet and have a debate on the issuing of escape from the camp. One of the officers directly disagreed with Nicholson when he advised the officers not to escape from the camp. The officer argued that staying in the camp is a sure way of getting kill ed. This shows the impact of an individualistic ulture as in a collectivist culture disagreement is usually make indirectly or very discreetly. The British (westerners) usually like to near the word No in order tor the core to be conveyed in effect they do not understand indirect negative responses.This large-hearted of participative nature and direct denial from an officer to the colonels advice signifies a low precedent distance index (PDI) as designer seems to be shared and well dispersed. This direct approach can also be seen in Nicholson when Saito tells him at the beginning of the plastic film that he will order his officers to work and he directly replies saying No. The local woman are feeling up to the men and taking care of them in the scene where the American is travel the POW camp to destroy the bridge. It seems as if the women expect the men to be tough, bumptious and be the provider.This shows that the local community is a high Masculinity index (MAS) culture. power structure has been shown in many instances during the film. As farthermost as the Japanese were concern, the Japanese soldier taking his cap off and deflected (In Japan there are rules for the Japanese equivalent of the Western handshake for who to bow, how much(prenominal) they should bow and hence are uncorrectable to master) to Saito at the beginning of he film, pitch him a plan to stand on as he was short and so that plurality look up to him and honour him, were some instances showing hierarchy amongst the Japanese. overly the man responsible for fanning the Saito does not speak due to respect and even if it is fall the soldier still stands outside the exposit as they are lower polish in the hierarchy. 0 Did you like the film? Why or why not? Yes, I liked the film. The film did not have a accountability or wrong due to which it follows a preposterous and realistic approach based on individuals. Like more war films it is uncomplete for nor against the war. By the end of the pic the viewer is less interested in the fact that who wins the war than about how the individuals will behave. 0 What adjective would you use to describe your reply to the film? Why did you react this way? As rightly described by Clipton at the end of the film, the adjective that can be utilise to describe my reply of the film is folly. Every individual in the film is inclined towards their own duty, order and chaos that they lose what really matters and what is most important. Emotions and orders have taken over the right or sane thing to do. The characters have hence led the situation to go out of hand. 0 In what ship canal can you identify with the movie, its characters and its message?The movie is more about the events surrounding the war rather than the battles and the fighting. These events have turned mortality, notion and sound conceit around and have eventually lead to madness. There are various examples of this so called madness in the movie the mad ness of Nicholson who says that working with the foeman is not spillage against ones country, the madness ot the American who accepts to return to a camp on a suicide mission where he escaped, nearly getting killed and he madness of a press the obliged men to make acrid decisions. Based on your knowledge of negotiations what do you theorise was going on? o What kind of bemire tricks were being utilize? Give 3 examples. Initially Saito apply a forceful approach in negotiating with the Nicholson. Saito caused emotional (By cutting food give and taking people from the hospital to work) and physical (When Saito slapped Nicholson and put him in the oven) means in order to persuade the soldiers to commence work on the bridge. Saito underestimated his BATNA (Best alternative to a negotiated agreement).I feel that during the time of positional bargaining with Nicholson, ultimately carving under stuff and letting them out of the oven, Saito should have used his own soldiers for th e bridge (Till such time Nicholson was persuaded to make his men work) and created discipline and collaboration among the workers for the timely completion of the bridge. I feel that there was little room for principled negotiation as Nicholson was not willing to do so. One of the dirty tricks used by Saito was that of threat when he warned Nicholson that if he does not order his troops to start work on the bridge he will be shot.Another dirty trick used by Saito in the initial part of the movie was that of Chinese water torture, signifying that he unbroken repeating his demands without bothering much about what Nicholson has to say. 6 The third dirty trick in the movie was when Saito asked the British soldier to meet with Nicholson for 5 minutes and tell him that if he doesnt order his officers to start work he will make the people in the hospital work. This was a coarse on Saitos part, even after hearing this Nicholson never changed his decision and the soldiers at the hospital were never made to work. What set are portrayed? independency, cooperation, hierarchy, power, etc? The value that are portrayed in the movie are Independence, hierarchy, bravery, power, pride, patriotism, collaboration, leadership and commitment to duty. 0 How were these values portrayed? o Give examples of the type of behaviour that you base your answer upon Independence was shown when the American played on his life in order to escape from the Japanese camp in order to be free.Hierarchy can be seen by the Japanese soldiers to Saito when they remove their cap and bow to him, when they get him a raised platform during the time of his speech, y the guard to Saitos house has to stand outside even though it is raining and by the man responsible for fanning not speaking in the entire movie. These major differences in hierarchy and the soldiers accepting an unequal distribution of power indicates a high power distance index (PDI). Bravery has been shown by Nicholson when he did not give in even though Saito threaten ed him witn a gun hidden in the truck. quislingism was shown by the soldiers once the bridge was the responsibility of Nicholson. This was not present when Saito is in charge of the bridge as stated by he British engineer when he was questioned by Nicholson what he would have done differently if this was his bridge. Because of the task-oriented approach of Nicholson and he proviso ahead timbre by step which can be seen when he says this is the end of the agenda while meeting with Saito for interchange of the proposal for the new bridge, the soldiers were able to effectively collaborate.This suggests that Nicholson is from a linear Active Culture. insolence and patriotism can be seen when the British officers were marching in group and whistling. 7 Leadership was portrayed by Nicholson when the British soldier brought him food in he oven. Nicholson had not seen sun light for days, was clean and deprived of food and water but even then he was more c oncern about his officers than about himself. committal to duty was shown by Nicholson when he took over the responsibility of the bridge.He made the best and most efficient bridge possible, forgetting about the war and his loyalties. 0 Was there anything about the movie (sights, sounds, smells, colors, background scenes) that told you something about the culture that you were dealing with? What did you learn? The type of culture seemed to be a collectivist one. This can be seen rom the behavior of the beau monde when the American escapes and reaches a village. 0 What does the movie tell you about the culture of the producers of the film?What about the film gives you this indication? The movie portrays glorification of western civilization in terms of perseverance and inventiveness, specifically the British. This indicates that the producer is from the British culture. Nicholson was able to circumvent Japanese commands due to his Engineers having the ability to construct a more t echnically sound bridge than the Japanese Engineers. 0 How do you think other interviews would react to this film? Why?I feel that other audience would feel that the film is more about the events surrounding the war rather than the battles and the fighting. These events have turned mortality, judgment and sound thought around and have eventually lead to madness. There are various examples of this so called madness in the movie the madness of Nicholson who says that working with the enemy is not going against ones country, the madness ot the American who accepts to return to a camp where ne escaped, nearly getting killed and the madness of a struggle the obliged men to make harsh decisions.